Value of a flow cytometry crossmatch in the setting of a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch in heart transplant recipients.

TitleValue of a flow cytometry crossmatch in the setting of a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch in heart transplant recipients.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsKeeshan BC, O'Connor MJ, Lin KY, Monos D, Lind C, Mascio CE, J Rame E, Spray TL, Shaddy RE, Rossano JW
JournalClin Transplant
Volume31
Issue10
Date Published2017 Oct
ISSN1399-0012
Abstract

Complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) is used for evaluation of preformed HLA-specific antibodies in patients undergoing heart transplantation. Flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) is a more sensitive assay and used with increasing frequency. To determine the clinical relevance of a positive FCXM in the context of negative CDCXM in heart transplantation, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to assess graft survival for three different patient cohorts defined by crossmatch results: T-cell and B-cell CDCXM+ ("CDCXM +" cohort), CDCXM- but T-cell and/or B-cell FCXM+ ("FCXM+" cohort), and T-cell/B-cell CDCXM- and FCXM- ("XM-" cohort). During the study period, 2,558 patients met inclusion criteria (10.7% CDCXM+, 18.8% FCXM+, 65.5% XM-). CDCXM+ patients had significantly decreased graft survival compared to FCXM+ and XM- cohorts (p=0.003 and <0.001 respectively). CDCXM- and FCXM+ patients did not have decreased graft survival compared to XM- patients (p=0.09). In multivariate analysis, only CDCXM+ was associated with decreased graft survival (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.49). In conclusion, positive FCXM in the context of negative CDCXM does not confer increased risk of graft failure. Further study is needed to understand implications of CDCXM and FCXM testing in heart transplant recipients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1111/ctr.13064
Alternate JournalClin Transplant
PubMed ID28766759