Use of a remote clinical decision support service for a multicenter trial to implement prediction rules for children with minor blunt head trauma.

TitleUse of a remote clinical decision support service for a multicenter trial to implement prediction rules for children with minor blunt head trauma.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsGoldberg HS, Paterno MD, Grundmeier RW, Rocha BH, Hoffman JM, Tham E, Swietlik M, Schaeffer MH, Pabbathi D, Deakyne SJ, Kuppermann N, Dayan PS
JournalInt J Med Inform
Volume87
Pagination101-10
Date Published2016 Mar
ISSN1872-8243
KeywordsAdolescent, Brain Injuries, Case Management, Child, Child, Preschool, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Electronic Health Records, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Remote Consultation
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the architecture, integration requirements, and execution characteristics of a remote clinical decision support (CDS) service used in a multicenter clinical trial. The trial tested the efficacy of implementing brain injury prediction rules for children with minor blunt head trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We integrated the Epic(®) electronic health record (EHR) with the Enterprise Clinical Rules Service (ECRS), a web-based CDS service, at two emergency departments. Patterns of CDS review included either a delayed, near-real-time review, where the physician viewed CDS recommendations generated by the nursing assessment, or a real-time review, where the physician viewed recommendations generated by their own documentation. A backstopping, vendor-based CDS triggered with zero delay when no recommendation was available in the EHR from the web-service. We assessed the execution characteristics of the integrated system and the source of the generated recommendations viewed by physicians.

RESULTS: The ECRS mean execution time was 0.74 ±0.72 s. Overall execution time was substantially different at the two sites, with mean total transaction times of 19.67 and 3.99 s. Of 1930 analyzed transactions from the two sites, 60% (310/521) of all physician documentation-initiated recommendations and 99% (1390/1409) of all nurse documentation-initiated recommendations originated from the remote web service.

DISCUSSION: The remote CDS system was the source of recommendations in more than half of the real-time cases and virtually all the near-real-time cases. Comparisons are limited by allowable variation in user workflow and resolution of the EHR clock.

CONCLUSION: With maturation and adoption of standards for CDS services, remote CDS shows promise to decrease time-to-trial for multicenter evaluations of candidate decision support interventions.

DOI10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.002
Alternate JournalInt J Med Inform
PubMed ID26806717
Grant ListS02MC19289-01-00 / / PHS HHS / United States
U03MC00001 / / PHS HHS / United States
U03MC00003 / / PHS HHS / United States
U03MC00006 / / PHS HHS / United States
U03MC00007 / / PHS HHS / United States
U03MC00008 / / PHS HHS / United States
U03MC22684 / / PHS HHS / United States
U03MC22685 / / PHS HHS / United States