Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure to Prevent Primary Noninvasive Ventilation Failure in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants.

TitleNasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure to Prevent Primary Noninvasive Ventilation Failure in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsBourque SL, Roberts RS, Wright CJ, Kirpalani H, Lemyre B, Millar D, Bamat NA
JournalJ Pediatr
Date Published2019 Oct 08
ISSN1097-6833
Abstract

Reducing the risk of primary noninvasive ventilation failure in extremely low birthweight infants is linked to reducing bronchopulmonary dysplasia. In a secondary analysis of randomized data, we identified that failure rates and time to failure were similar for nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

DOI10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.08.064
Alternate JournalJ. Pediatr.
PubMed ID31604630