- Research Methods &
- Research Training
- Research Into
|Title||A Heuristic Evaluation to Assess Use of After Visit Summaries for Supporting Continuity of Care.|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2018|
|Authors||Tremoulet P, Krishnan R, Karavite D, Muthu N, Regli SHarkness, Will A, Michel J|
|Journal||Appl Clin Inform|
|Date Published||2018 07|
|Keywords||Ambulatory Care, Continuity of Patient Care, Documentation, Electronic Health Records, Heuristics, Humans, Outpatients|
BACKGROUND: Outpatient providers often do not receive discharge summaries from acute care providers prior to follow-up visits. These outpatient providers may use the after-visit summaries (AVS) that are given to patients to obtain clinical information. It is unclear how effectively AVS support care coordination between clinicians.
OBJECTIVES: Goals for this effort include: (1) developing usability heuristics that may be applied both for assessment and to guide generation of medical documents in general, (2) conducting a heuristic evaluation to assess the use of AVS for communication between clinicians, and (3) providing recommendations for generating AVS that effectively support both patient/caregiver use and care coordination.
METHODS: We created a 17-item heuristic evaluation instrument for assessing usability of medical documents. Eight experts used the instrument to assess each of four simulated AVS. The simulations were created using examples from two hospitals and two pediatric patient cases developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
RESULTS: Experts identified 224 unique usability problems ranging in severity from mild to catastrophic. Content issues (e.g., missing medical history, marital status of a 2-year-old) were rated as most severe, but widespread formatting and structural problems (e.g., inconsistent indentation, fonts, and headings; confusing ordering of information) were so distracting that they significantly reduced readers' ability to efficiently use the documents. Overall, issues in the AVS from Hospital 2 were more severe than those in the AVS from Hospital 1.
CONCLUSION: The new instrument allowed for quick, inexpensive evaluations of AVS. Usability issues such as unnecessary information, poor organization, missing information, and inconsistent formatting make it hard for patients, caregivers, and clinicians to use the AVS. The heuristics in the new instrument may be used as guidance to adapt electronic health record systems so that they generate more useful and usable medical documents.
|Alternate Journal||Appl Clin Inform|
|PubMed Central ID||PMC6135642|