The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center.

TitleThe fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsLee B, Otero HJ, Whitehead MT
JournalPediatr Radiol
Volume47
Issue13
Pagination1724-1729
Date Published2017 Dec
ISSN1432-1998
KeywordsChild, Communication, Continuity of Patient Care, Diagnostic Imaging, Female, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Retrospective Studies
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American College of Radiology (ACR) practice parameters for communication dictate that follow-up recommendations be suggested when appropriate. Radiologists assume that referring physicians read their reports and heed their advice. In reality, recommendations might not be carried out or even acknowledged.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the proportion of imaging recommendations that are acknowledged and acted upon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all consecutive radiology reports containing "recommend" in the impression at a single academic children's hospital over a 1-month period. We documented point of care (emergency department, inpatient, outpatient), study type, recommendation wording, and communication method (report only or direct verbal). We reviewed medical records to ascertain whether the recommendations were acknowledged or executed. We used chi-square tests to evaluate associations between variables. P<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS: We reviewed 526 reports and excluded 73. We included the remaining 453 reports, from 370 unique patients (201 male, 169 female). Inpatients comprised most reports (n=223), followed by emergency department (ED) patients (n=118) and outpatients (n=112). Among these reports, 69% (n=313) of recommendations were executed. Of the 140 recommendations not carried out, 14% were acknowledged in clinical notes. Compliance correlated with point of care (ED>inpatient>outpatient; P=0.001) but not with additional verbal communication (P=0.33), study type (radiograph vs. other; P=0.35) or type of follow-up recommendation (follow-up imaging vs. other; P=0.99).

CONCLUSION: Nearly one-third of radiology report follow-up recommendations are not executed. Recommendations are most commonly neglected for outpatient imaging reports. The radiology community should take steps to improve recommendation adherence.

DOI10.1007/s00247-017-3960-4
Alternate JournalPediatr Radiol
PubMed ID28852809