Development of a pragmatic measure for evaluating and optimizing rapid response systems.

TitleDevelopment of a pragmatic measure for evaluating and optimizing rapid response systems.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2012
AuthorsBonafide CP, Roberts KE, Priestley MA, Tibbetts KM, Huang E, Nadkarni VM, Keren R
JournalPediatrics
Volume129
Issue4
Paginatione874-81
Date Published2012 Apr
ISSN1098-4275
KeywordsCardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Heart Arrest, Hospital Mortality, Hospital Rapid Response Team, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Infant, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, United States
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Standard metrics for evaluating rapid response systems (RRSs) include cardiac and respiratory arrest rates. These events are rare in children; therefore, years of data are needed to evaluate the impact of RRSs with sufficient statistical power. We aimed to develop a valid, pragmatic measure for evaluating and optimizing RRSs over shorter periods of time.

METHODS: We reviewed 724 medical emergency team and 56 code-blue team activations in a children's hospital between February 2010 and February 2011. We defined events resulting in ICU transfer and noninvasive ventilation, intubation, or vasopressor infusion within 12 hours as "critical deterioration." By using in-hospital mortality as the gold standard, we evaluated the test characteristics and validity of this proximate outcome metric compared with a national benchmark for cardiac and respiratory arrest rates, the Child Health Corporation of America Codes Outside the ICU Whole System Measure.

RESULTS: Critical deterioration (1.52 per 1000 non-ICU patient-days) was more than eightfold more common than the Child Health Corporation of America measure of cardiac and respiratory arrests (0.18 per 1000 non-ICU patient-days) and was associated with >13-fold increased risk of in-hospital death. The critical deterioration metric demonstrated both criterion and construct validity.

CONCLUSIONS: The critical deterioration rate is a valid, pragmatic proximate outcome associated with in-hospital mortality. It has great potential for complementing existing patient safety measures for evaluating RRS performance.

DOI10.1542/peds.2011-2784
Alternate JournalPediatrics
PubMed ID22392182